Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150625
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '17 at 18:20
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$65 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 96.3 1-Core 112 2-Core 222 83% 143 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 601 66% 520 Pts	64-Core 600 37% 600 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.9.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 94.5 Parallax 180 98% 132 fps	MRender 90 Gravity 116 Splatting 131 94% 113 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8958 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3263 (B1) Unknown 99 99 57 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 60 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 393 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21839803832	126% Outstanding	Read 529 Write 497 Mixed 510 114% 512 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 49.5 190% 72.1 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 170 180% 298 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 124%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 119GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14646 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5667 (B1) Unknown 89 89 371 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 57 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 638 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14558345979	72.6% Very good	Read 509 Write 234 Mixed 352 80% 365 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 66.7 4K Mixed 21.4 100% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 70.1 DQ Mixed 57.8 74% 140 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 76%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 97GB free Firmware: 525ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5452594 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 93106301056456 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5317 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 634 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 75 42954588184 (C2) HDA temperature 24 75 42954588184 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5452594 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5452594 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5452594 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3797 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4126 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4126 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2930	93.1% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 300 Mixed 327 84% 381 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 22.2 146% 60.2 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 78.6 110% 203 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 85%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$91 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 607GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 132 4000 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5392 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6583 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3507 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 508 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 14324 (C2) HDA temperature 116 106 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	74.4% Very good	Read 124 Write 134 Mixed 122 96% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.47 4K Mixed 0.29 116% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 21.9 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 22.3 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 52.8 76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,617x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	442x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	222x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	403x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	227x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	156x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	109x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	105x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	91x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $925

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16