Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 18 '17 at 20:00
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 94.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 512
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.3% Good
Lighting 74.8
Reflection 76.6
Parallax 65.7
61% 72.4 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 73.4
59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
148GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 417
Mixed 200
83% 376 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 35.9
130% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 94.1
103% 173 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 124%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 439
Write 114
Mixed 140
50% 231 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 6.52
63% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 94.9
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 26
43% 81.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
882GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 142
Write 153
Mixed 120
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.22
4K Write 2.53
4K Mixed 0.35
137% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
226GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62% Good
Read 113
Write 103
Mixed 82.5
74% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.41
114% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $570
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback