Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170308
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '17 at 22:37
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 782
73% 606 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3777) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2078 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.1% Good
Lighting 83.2
Reflection 79.2
Parallax 69.5
68% 77.3 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 72.1
60% 73.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 2,197
Write 1,039
Mixed 1,102
317% 1,446 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 23.3
141% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 75.2
DQ Mixed 61.7
56% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 197%
Great: 236%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 115
Write 177
Mixed 131
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 5.37
4K Mixed 0.77
217% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 101
Write 183
Mixed 129
103% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
94% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
689GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 112
80% 112 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
619GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 149
Write 145
Mixed 141
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.34
142% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 109%
Mass Storage Device 500GB
358GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 37.6
Write 34
Mixed 33.4
44% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.2
20% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14%
Great: 22%
Generic External 500GB
54GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.81% Terrible
Read 36.3
Write 10.5
Mixed 20.7
25% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.71
4K Mixed 0.13
30% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.81%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 25.8
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $450
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback