Medion MS-7800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MS-7800  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7800
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120604
Uptime12.2 Days
Run DateNov 24 '17 at 14:27
Run Duration465 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 58.8
2-Core 105
53% 82.6 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 182
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
MSI(1462 7800) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.947.0.0
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 5.33
Reflection 7.96
Parallax 4.66
4% 5.98 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 0.13
2% 3.21 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
811GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 116
Write 106
Mixed 105
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.16
74% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 63%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
509GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 73.8
Write 75.5
Mixed 74.6
56% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.24
4K Mixed 0.007
19% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 51%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 137
Write 134
Mixed 37.9
122% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.24
75% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 66%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
700GB free, PID 0579
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 24
Mixed 23.1
31% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.14
54% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 48%
ST1000DM 003-9YN162 1TB
520GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 35.8
Mixed 13.1
34% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.35
60% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 24%
ASMT 2105 1TB
131GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 86.2
Write 82.8
Mixed 77.1
105% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.06
4K Write 0.24
4K Mixed 0.07
11% 0.12 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 79%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B1 1TB
18GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 35.5
Mixed 8.85
31% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.28
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X2G64CB88G7N-DG M2X2G64CB88G7N-DG 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7800 Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MS-7800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $135
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback