Asus P8H77-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M LE (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130118
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '18 at 10:51
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 94 1-Core 104 2-Core 205 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 472 50% 400 Pts	64-Core 513 32% 513 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 042A) 2GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.10.3 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Lighting 35.4 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 43.1 29% 36.8 fps	MRender 28 Gravity 29.7 Splatting 37.5 27% 31.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3353 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 711 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 54 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 12 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11740574871	63.5% Good	Read 382 Write 315 Mixed 266 71% 321 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 20 87% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 40.4 DQ Write 88.5 DQ Mixed 23.1 29% 50.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 55GB free Firmware: 505ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 -122990683471981 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2211 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 238 (B1) Unknown 0 0 10 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 86 73020080161 (C2) HDA temperature 33 86 73020080161 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 92 92 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 23218 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6189 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6189 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5083	34.4% Below average	Read 195 Write 77.3 Mixed 111 28% 128 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 11.1 67% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 28.4 DQ Write 77.5 DQ Mixed 13.1 22% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 500GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 134 4150 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6538 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16157 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2208 (C0) Power-off retract count 197 197 2323 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 116 116 254509 (C2) HDA temperature 110 89 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	68.3% Good	Read 116 Write 121 Mixed 81.5 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.57 4K Mixed 0.24 95% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 13GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 11.7 Mixed 12.9 18% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.49 4K Write 2.58 4K Mixed 1.34 150% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 43,127 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 18.4 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 18.2 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 59.8 67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M LE Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M LE

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	158x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	124x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	50x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	67x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	25x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	18x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16