Asrock K10N78M

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock K10N78M (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100622
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '18 at 06:17
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9650-$125 2,698 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Memory 71.9 1-Core 33.3 2-Core 65.9 39% 57 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 129 17% 129 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 50%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800 6,394 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.06% Terrible	Lighting 4.97 Reflection 6.15 Parallax 1.44 4% 4.19 fps	MRender 7.24 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 4.52 4% 5.09 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.06% Great: 4%
Nvidia GeForce 8100 / nForce 720a 143 User benchmarks, average bench 0% ASRock(1849 084F) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	0.5% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.96 Parallax 0.09 0% 0.52 fps	MRender 1.33 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.83 1% 0.85 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.5% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS330 120GB 735 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: AP122PD0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7311 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 841 (A3) Unknown 100 100 60 (A4) Unknown 100 100 33 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 42560512 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 475 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (E7) Temperature 100 100 67 (F1) Unknown 100 100 10779456435	41.8% Average	Read 215 Write 186 Mixed 199 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 11.4 66% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 23 DQ Write 87.7 DQ Mixed 13.7 23% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 96%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 291GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4366 (03) Spinup time 137 133 4150 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9774 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 53 53 34762 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4029 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 731 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9774 (C2) HDA temperature 105 85 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 65 65 25906 (F1) Unknown 200 200 37124937326 (F2) Unknown 200 200 26959567432	59.1% Above average	Read 102 Write 104 Mixed 75.9 70% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.42 111% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.3% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 8.3 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 97.1 41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock K10N78M

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)