Lenovo 90FL000WAU

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 90FL000WAU (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 364A
Memory	5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160823
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '18 at 10:50
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 107 2-Core 188 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 490 54% 426 Pts	64-Core 596 37% 596 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.9% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 115 Parallax 101 89% 108 fps	MRender 89.8 Gravity 103 Splatting 82.5 74% 91.9 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 925GB free Firmware: M3CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 132 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 45 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 11 (B4) Unknown 0 0 40 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 60 52 206158430248 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 97697728 (F7) Unknown 100 100 1564452 (F8) Unknown 100 100 15492	97.6% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 372 Mixed 399 95% 427 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 38.3 138% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 84.3 114% 209 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 125%
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2475 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 460 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 90 90 302 (AE) Unknown 100 100 93 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 144 (C2) HDA temperature 70 54 197569282078 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 16 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 90 90 10 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 30146928125 (F7) Unknown 100 100 117873975 (F8) Unknown 100 100 587310275	85.8% Excellent	Read 513 Write 448 Mixed 462 106% 474 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 18.6 108% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 30.4 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 12.3 49% 102 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 113%
WD Red 10TB (2017)-$419 1,763 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 7TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 110 (03) Spinup time 162 162 34386215320 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 396 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1467 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 328 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2685 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2685 (C2) HDA temperature 180 180 184684380196 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	118% Outstanding	Read 222 Write 190 Mixed 178 147% 196 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 4.69 4K Mixed 0.28 153% 1.94 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D32BEEAK.K8FB 2x8GB 664 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.3% Good	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 19.7 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 17.9 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 90FL000WAU

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)