Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '18 at 11:40
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 72.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 256
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 857
83% 681 Pts
64-Core 1061
66% 1061 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Asus(1043 052D) 2GB
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Lighting 27.7
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 35.3
23% 30.9 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 27
Splatting 34.2
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
218GB free
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 1,416
Write 356
Mixed 281
147% 684 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 11.2
61% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 406
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 6.58
93% 225 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 111%
Great: 144%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 1,391
Write 156
Mixed 386
138% 644 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 9.88
54% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 25.8
DQ Mixed 7.18
10% 18 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 144%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
2TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 182
Mixed 177
139% 185 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.22
88% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.3% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 14.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 9.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback