| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 5040 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140225 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 11 '18 at 17:26 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.8%
Good
|
66% 112 Pts
|
36% 275 Pts
|
19% 304 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
|
31.4%
Below average
|
32% 35.5 fps
|
30% 36.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
59.7%
Above average
|
52% 234 MB/s
|
108% 37 MB/s
|
56% 79.6 MB/s
|
|
|
59.8%
Above average
|
80% 105 MB/s
|
145% 1.31 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.2%
Above average
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
41% 14.2 GB/s
|
55% 72.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,674 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 191x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 178x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 167x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 235x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 109x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 105x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $525 |