Asus P8H61-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '18 at 19:14
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$190
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 194
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 476
51% 404 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.32% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.49 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.57
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.32%
Great: 1%
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 362E) 1GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1435 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 18
Parallax 19.2
18% 19.6 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 18.9
18% 21.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$50
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.7% Below average
Read 225
Write 151
Mixed 123
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 8.86
56% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 31.4
DQ Mixed 9.19
12% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
905GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 134
Mixed 73.3
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.38
102% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M EVO Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $129
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback