Asrock H61M-DG3/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DG3/USB3  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateApr 18 '16 at 03:56
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 147
59% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 262
34% 257 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Gigabyte(1458 3557) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6472
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 22.6
16% 20.1 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 16.9
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.5% Good
Read 268
Write 213
Mixed 219
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 30.2
96% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 78
84% 141 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 115%
Samsung HD502HJ 1TB
456GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 105
Write 97.7
Mixed 105
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.19
80% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 99%
WD WD10EARX-32N0YB0 500GB
320GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10006 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 130
Write 125
Mixed 120
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.41
108% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.1% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-DG3/USB3 Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DG3/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback