QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '18 at 10:09
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 592
79% 592 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2214 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.7% Average
Lighting 54.1
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 50.9
44% 56 fps
MRender 76.4
Gravity 54.2
Splatting 61.1
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 64GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 272 260 261 260 260 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 386
Write 398
Mixed 200
SusWrite 268
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 39.3
135% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 164
145% 224 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 85%
Great: 85%
Qemu HARDDISK 437GB
181GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 428 452 467 464 451 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
111% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 468
Mixed 409
SusWrite 454
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 47.8
161% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 345
250% 322 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 27.3
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 38.4
SC Mixed 28.7
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 94%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback