Hp-pavilion BK150AA-ABA p6331p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion BK150AA-ABA p6331p  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN ALOE
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091026
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '18 at 03:39
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 630
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 82.6
43% 65.2 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 149
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 2A92) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.862.3.0
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 0.44
0% 0.82 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.61
1% 0.89 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB
560GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 87 36 47 22 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 81.1
Write 89
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 52.6
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP497157-C01-ELDW 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BK150AA-ABA p6331p Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion BK150AA-ABA p6331p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback