ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-9661

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	MSI MCP55
Motherboard	MSI MS-9661 (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '18 at 09:25
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2354 4 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU0-Socket F, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.5% Average	Memory 66.9 1-Core 28.8 2-Core 65.4 36% 53.7 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 130 18% 130 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lsilogic Logical Volume 249GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 85 82 85 73 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 75%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power8G 8GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.8 7.9 6.9 7.3 7.9 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	4.44% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 5.5 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 6.9 9% 8.08 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.44% Great: 5%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 279GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 26 27 27 26 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 32 Write 30.5 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 27 37% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x4GB 5,222 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	21.9% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 8 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 148%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MS-9661 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-9661

CPU
CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 23521stBench 40%, 73 samples	1x
AMD Opteron 2423 HESix-CoreBench 43%, 5 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 47%, 22,284 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
50 1TBCt1000bxBench 63%, 468 samples	1x
SUV400S3712 120GBKingstonBench 34%, 503 samples	1x

RAM
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	1x
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback