Asrock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '18 at 01:23
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 153
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 372
40% 318 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.3% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 125
Parallax 118
91% 118 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 118
Splatting 96.8
86% 106 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
490GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 390 421 387 390 386 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 455
Mixed 364
SusWrite 396
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 39
125% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 258
224% 331 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 126%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
604GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 122
Write 114
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 64.3
74% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 76%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 159 160 161 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 156
Mixed 100
SusWrite 159
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 100%
WD WD3200KS-00PFB0 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 62 62 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 61
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 61.8
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
224GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 122 122 122 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 119
Write 122
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 122
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 109%
WD My Passport 259F 3TB
2TB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 13 22 88 83 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 118
Write 97.2
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 51.2
116% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.5
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Extreme3 Gen3 Builds (Compare 776 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $463
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback