bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive25% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateAug 22 '18 at 16:29
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
CPU socket #0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.9% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 145
58% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 281
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.1 6.5 6.8 6.9 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25% Poor
Read 300
Write 21.5
Mixed 118
SusWrite 7.1
24% 112 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 11.8
35% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 38.3
DQ Write 30.1
DQ Mixed 39.6
28% 36 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25%
Great: 77%
Vmware Virtual disk 54GB
23GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 6.9 6.5 6.5 6.6 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 361
Write 254
Mixed 236
SusWrite 6.8
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 14
38% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 48.2
DQ Write 28
DQ Mixed 33.4
26% 36.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 77%
Vmware Virtual disk 11GB
10GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 7 6.6 7.1 6.8 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 359
Write 29.8
Mixed 142
SusWrite 7.1
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 12.7
38% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 44.2
DQ Write 31.5
DQ Mixed 36.9
28% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 2GB
2GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7 6.6 7.1 7 7.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.3% Poor
Read 350
Write 30.8
Mixed 164
SusWrite 7.1
30% 138 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 14.4
37% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 40.3
DQ Write 37.1
DQ Mixed 37.7
29% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 64 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 18.1
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 14.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback