Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H270M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170329
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateAug 23 '18 at 07:39
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 86.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 237
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 624
66% 528 Pts
64-Core 732
45% 732 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 25
Parallax 20.3
18% 22.3 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 28.3
22% 26.4 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 19%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 36 34 31 43 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 123
Write 55.5
Mixed 86
SusWrite 35.7
17% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 18.7
95% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 53.1
78% 154 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 85%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65
97GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 385 413 372 426 342 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 400
Write 401
Mixed 359
SusWrite 394
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 39.4
154% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 342
245% 315 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
445GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 102 102 97 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 50.7
Write 70
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 100
51% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate Wireless 1TB
128GB free, PID a313
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 58 58 60 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 84.2
Write 59.5
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 58.8
82% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
252GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 53 50 53 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
24% Poor
Read 54
Write 55.3
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 52.7
67% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFD8213.C16FH1 859B CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 21
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 21
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback