Today's hottest deals

Samsung 670Z5E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 670Z5E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP670Z5E-XD1BR
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '18 at 22:27
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 120
58% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 179
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M200X
Sanyo(144D C0E7) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 24.20.12019.1010
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
9.55% Terrible
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 15.9
10% 13.3 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 10.5
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.55%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jmicron Generic 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 64 24 59 79 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 355
Write 254
Mixed 156
SusWrite 82.7
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 10.8
43% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 31.2
39% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 65%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 27 40 57 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 52.7
Write 48.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 42.4
31% 42.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.2
58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
29.6% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 670Z5E Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 670Z5E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback