Today's hottest deals

Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-V  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 31 '18 at 16:22
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 173
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 442
46% 370 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
MSI(1462 C307) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 136
Parallax 128
103% 130 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 123
Splatting 105
88% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor STM380211AS 80GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 8.8 36 42 45 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.41% Terrible
Read 2.3
Write 2
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 30.6
7% 9.4 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 40%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$32
49GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 39 43 46 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 18.7
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 34.8
16% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 13.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback