PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160329 |
Uptime | 14.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 02 '18 at 00:23 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
|
55.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maxtor 6Y160M0 164GB-$117
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: YAR51HW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 30 24 13 21 32 MB/s
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
114GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 78 73 65 71 80 MB/s
|
44%
Average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
544GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 60 61 61 65 75 MB/s
|
37.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 48x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 27x |
FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 5x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $642 |