Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 9% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

Motherboard	Parallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '18 at 02:13
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4260U 870 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.05 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Memory 19.2 1-Core 22.5 2-Core 41.5 16% 27.7 Pts	4-Core 33.9 8-Core 40.1 5% 37 Pts	64-Core 14.9 1% 14.9 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM) 2,233 User benchmarks, average bench 26% ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 256MB Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 11.1.32408.0 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	3.26% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 5.85 Parallax 1.84 4% 4.02 fps	MRender 3.71 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 5 3% 3.05 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 3.26% Great: 47%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Windows 7-0 SSD 137GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: F.083BGM SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 50 47 60 38 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28% Poor	Read 251 Write 243 Mixed 365 SusWrite 54.6 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 5.7 39% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 51 DQ Mixed 58.2 48% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 8 slots used 2GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.7% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 7.1 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 326 12% 326 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,058x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	827x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325