Acer Veriton M680G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Veriton M680G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M680G
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '18 at 21:53
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 161
69% 113 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 350
39% 305 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Sapphire(174B 1162) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.65
Parallax 1.84
2% 2.28 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 2.39
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
984GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 70 69 67 75 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 89.4
Write 257
Mixed 36
SusWrite 85.6
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.8
206% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 108%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 927GB
815GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 57 60 59 63 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 316
Write 323
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 76.6
136% 188 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 80AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1334, 1334, 1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M680G Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M680G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback