HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160218
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '18 at 01:16
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 169
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 472
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 69%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 37.7
34% 40 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 37
Splatting 39.8
34% 42.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1A 256GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6T3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 280
Write 253
Mixed 211
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 30.3
100% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 240
203% 297 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 105%
Hitachi HMRSK000 2TB
597GB free
Firmware: 3P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 69 72 72 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 87.2
Write 79.5
Mixed 50
SusWrite 70.3
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 28.6
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback