PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z640 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212A |
Memory | 25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160218 |
Uptime | 7.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 21 '18 at 01:16 |
Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 61% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
|
69%
Good
|
67% 114 Pts
|
48% 390 Pts
|
32% 511 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77
|
34.3%
Below average
|
34% 40 fps
|
34% 42.6 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
79.3%
Very good
|
87% 30.3 GB/s
|
44% 15.2 GB/s
|
51% 78.7 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 113x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 104x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 98x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 150x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 118x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 63x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $509 |