Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory35.6 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '18 at 20:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 1.50GHz
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.5% Above average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 88
46% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 389
35% 294 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 91
Reflection 126
Parallax 179
74% 132 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 165
Splatting 122
110% 135 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1736 1728 1721 1774 1795 1803 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,014
Write 1,806
Mixed 1,153
SusWrite 1,759
378% 1,683 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 45.1
145% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 280
204% 269 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 245%
Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5173CB0-CK0 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 40GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.7% Average
MC Read 23
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 17.2
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.4
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback