HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z6 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C6
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '18 at 05:40
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4116
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 140
59% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 612
55% 462 Pts
64-Core 1,249
77% 1,249 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P6000
Nvidia(10DE 11A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1657 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 180
Parallax 165
115% 162 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 178
Splatting 123
112% 138 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 701 422 420 412 396 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,836
Write 1361
Mixed 891
SusWrite 458
252% 1,137 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 57.2
212% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 957
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 839
638% 863 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 205%
Great: 259%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
184GB free
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 631 633 626 621 625 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,938
Write 1,373
Mixed 950
SusWrite 668
274% 1,232 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 78.9
269% 95.8 MB/s
DQ Read 914
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 829
624% 837 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 239%
Great: 259%
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
179GB free
Firmware: E8FK11.L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 546 260 261 260 260 261 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 825
Write 797
Mixed 782
SusWrite 308
152% 678 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 51.1
178% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 699
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 587
472% 661 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 138%
Great: 141%
G-RAID 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 375 352 353 360 356 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 339
Write 350
Mixed 99.7
SusWrite 360
208% 287 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.5
174% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 200%
Great: 200%
External RAID 6TB
1.5TB free, PID ce34
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 42
Mixed 42
SusWrite 41.4
57% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 21%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
120GB free, PID 1000, Samsung
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 43 46 45 43 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 60.5
Mixed 96
SusWrite 44.8
112% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 10.6
1,003% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 18.3
DQ Mixed 12
1,095% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 4x8GB
4 of 6 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (91st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
111% Outstanding
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 45.3
MC Mixed 39.9
129% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback