Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SRH-CF
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151217
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateOct 02 '18 at 21:36
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 560
55% 449 Pts
64-Core 797
49% 797 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 107GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 135 147 137 111 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 109
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 135
151% 208 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.2
273% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 187%
Great: 187%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 2.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 141 146 138 152 140 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
224% Outstanding
Read 645
Write 163
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 138
183% 254 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
254% 2.03 MB/s
USB Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 5.5
Mixed 4
SusWrite 6.2
9% 8.25 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (91st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
107% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 37.3
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 18.8
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 734 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback