Today's hottest deals

HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP xw8600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory12.2 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 04 '18 at 20:40
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 42.3
2-Core 84.9
40% 62.8 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 306
28% 235 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.2% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 63
Parallax 61.8
37% 56.7 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 44.9
Splatting 52.9
44% 53.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 119 114 118 117 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.1% Below average
Read 119
Write 99
Mixed 120
SusWrite 116
26% 113 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 23.1
70% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 97.2
DQ Write 88.8
DQ Mixed 46.8
48% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
310GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 234 229 232 230 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.2% Above average
Read 232
Write 213
Mixed 219
SusWrite 228
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 22.8
79% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 170
127% 170 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 134%
DATA 8TB
762GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 14 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.9% Below average
Read 110
Write 5.3
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 14.6
27% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback