PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP xw8600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A98h |
Memory | 12.2 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120920 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 04 '18 at 20:40 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
45.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 119 114 118 117 116 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
310GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 234 229 232 230 232 MB/s
|
55.2%
Above average
|
|||
DATA 8TB
762GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 14 15 MB/s
|
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples | 21x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples | 17x |
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 11x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $224 |