Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5738

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire 5738  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JV50
Memory3.1 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 11:08
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4300
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 27.8
2-Core 51.1
34% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 51.2
8-Core 55.4
7% 53.3 Pts
64-Core 56.8
4% 56.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Acer(1025 0205) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 2.42
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.88 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.39 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 46 50 50 40 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 55.5
Write 27.3
Mixed 32
SusWrite 45.1
30% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 39%
Generic- Multi-Card 2GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.29% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 1.3
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1.8
4% 3.78 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.29%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
1024, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.5
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5738 Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5738

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback