Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121012
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMay 24 '16 at 13:13
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 112
56% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 224
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6519
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 30.2
21% 26.6 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 24.7
22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
427GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 159
Write 152
Mixed 20
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.22
94% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AA01110 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 73.2
Write 79.4
Mixed 52.7
51% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.49
110% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 60%
Samsung Spinpoint MP4 2.5" 500GB
66GB free
Firmware: 2AK10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 55.6
Write 67.6
Mixed 34.4
39% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ4GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ4GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB
667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.1% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.6
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback