Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '18 at 18:15
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 139
59% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 209
29% 212 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.250.0.0
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 7.57
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.16
6% 7.74 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 8.74
6% 7.01 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 107GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,534
Write 3,142
Mixed 2,955
715% 3,210 MB/s
4K Read 234
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 222
752% 223 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 464
DQ Mixed 476
357% 477 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 80%
52netbar iShareDisk 419GB
79GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 15.5
Write 34.3
Mixed 31
SusWrite 35.2
22% 29 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 6
1,017% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33.5% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback