Asus G73Jh

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G73Jh  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Jh
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '18 at 06:07
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 92
1-Core 58.8
2-Core 89.1
54% 80 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 206
22% 176 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Asus(1043 1C02) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.57% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 9.15
Parallax 11.8
10% 11.2 fps
MRender 9.14
Gravity 9.33
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.71 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.57%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHY2250B 250GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 8.6 7.4 10 10 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
5.45% Terrible
Read 9.3
Write 11.8
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 9.6
8% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 80CE M471B5273CH0-CH9 ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G73Jh Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jh

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback