MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7693
Motherboard	MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20151221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '16 at 18:10
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 70.5 1-Core 24.7 2-Core 47.5 34% 47.6 Pts	4-Core 85.8 8-Core 136 14% 111 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% EVGA(3842 1302) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4052 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.33 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.7 1% 0.91 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 8600960866 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -127010772876704 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 503 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 301 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 36 41 90197000228 (C2) HDA temperature 36 41 90197000228 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 102 102 8600960866 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 102 102 8600960866 (CC) Soft ECC correction 102 102 8600960866 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 38654705664 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1483 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1170 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1170 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1126 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1572874	48.2% Average	Read 472 Write 114 Mixed 179 55% 255 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 12.9 64% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 86.6 DQ Write 64.4 DQ Mixed 31.5 36% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 73%
WL1000GSA6472 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1TB free Firmware: 60.0AB60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3 (03) Spinup time 170 165 6466 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1033 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1194 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 829 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 90 11 (BC) Unknown 99 85 21476147225 (BE) vendor-specific 67 46 572588065 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 487 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 545 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	25.6% Poor	Read 63.1 Write 26.2 Mixed 35.5 31% 41.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.52 4K Mixed 0.21 50% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 70%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$48 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 18GB free Firmware: 4.AAA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4100 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 175176779 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 27167 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3754 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 46 639959078 (C2) HDA temperature 38 54 94489280550 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 66 60 63466981 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 179 737 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	22% Poor	Read 10.7 Write 65.7 Mixed 18.4 23% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.31 76% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 12.8 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7.5 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	965x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	413x
FX-8320AMD $203Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	264x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	169x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	150x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	142x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	87x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	85x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	141x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	48x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363