Dell OptiPlex GX280

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex GX280
MotherboardDell OptiPlex GX280  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20040917
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateOct 23 '18 at 23:09
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 27.1
2-Core 38.6
31% 42.3 Pts
4-Core 38.4
8-Core 39
5% 38.7 Pts
64-Core 39
2% 39 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Msft Virtual Disk 31GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.6 0.9 1 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Read 4.7
Write 0.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1.7
2% 2.27 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
52% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 10%
Maxtor 6Y080M0 80GB
20GB free
Firmware: YAR51HW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 43 43 43 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 36.3
Write 40.2
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 43
28% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 32%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
0GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 12.5
Write 2.7
6% 7.6 MB/s
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
5GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.1 4.3 2.9 3.7 4.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 3.8
7% 6.22 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 7%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
18GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 14
Mixed 16
SusWrite 13
22% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
81% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 256, 256 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.3
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex GX280 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex GX280

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback