MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7309
MotherboardMSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '16 at 12:22
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 86.6
46% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 87
8-Core 87.2
12% 87.1 Pts
64-Core 87.7
5% 87.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B E810) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.3000
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
8.99% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 9.73
Parallax 8.22
10% 9.85 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 7.73
Splatting 12.7
8% 9.47 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.99%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 101
Write 114
Mixed 106
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.27
77% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM2X1024-6400 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB 0h DDR2 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
27% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309) Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback