Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '18 at 10:45
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 95.6
46% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 168
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 350
PowerColor(148C 7350) 2GB
CLim: 805 MHz, MLim: 1075 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.10.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 0
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 13.6
0% 9.17 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 9.07
Splatting 16.1
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 500GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 87.3
Write 11
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 2.5
22% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 5.2
698% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 41%
Virtual Disk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.5% Poor
Read 67.7
Write 10.2
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 3.7
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 5.1
942% 5.53 MB/s
Virtual Disk 120GB
44GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 43%
Virtual Disk 2GB
2GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.2% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 6.8
Mixed 16
SusWrite 3.7
10% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 PSD34G16002 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.5% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 13.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.2
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback