Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 7745G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 7745G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JV71-CP
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '18 at 16:10
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 106
49% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 153
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Acer(1025 0367) 2GB
Driver: atiu9p64.dll Ver. 8.713.3.3000
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.27
Reflection 5.69
Parallax 4.22
4% 5.06 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 3.63
Splatting 6.09
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Red 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$125
622GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 39 29 27 48 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 69.1
Write 70
Mixed 46
SusWrite 39.5
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.6
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 7745G Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 7745G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $33
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback