PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T5600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T5600 (all builds) |
Memory | 29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180621 |
Uptime | 4 Days |
Run Date | Nov 01 '18 at 01:24 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
61.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.34
|
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 190 149 140 142 137 MB/s
|
56.9%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS72202 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: A20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 128 128 128 128 MB/s
|
75%
Very good
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
26GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 15 15 13 11 MB/s
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung-00CE M393B1G70BH0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 101x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 82x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 66x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $200Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 55x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 51x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 47x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $235 |