Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory39 GB free of 48 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110329
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 04 '16 at 20:28
Run Duration637 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 97.1
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 176
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 516
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6825
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 104
Reflection 132
Parallax 120
85% 118 fps
Gravity 120
Splatting 101
96% 110 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
572GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.1% Above average
Read 261
Write 180
Mixed 182
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 21.1
96% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 40.8
56% 105 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 126%
LSI 9750-24i4e DISK 9TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 5.12
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI 9750-24i4e DISK 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 5.12
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.4% Outstanding
Read 239
Write 104
Mixed 66.8
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.31
118% 1.22 MB/s
LSI 9650SE-16ML 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4.10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 96% Great: 99%
Hitachi HMS5C4040ALE640 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: MPAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 128
Write 120
Mixed 105
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.19
95% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.9% Very poor
Read 27.4
Write 14
Mixed 20
15% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.02
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
2% 0.02 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 15%
LSI 9750-24i4e DISK 4TB
758GB free
Firmware: 5.12
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.9% Good
Read 145
Write 98.7
Mixed 105
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 0.53
4K Mixed 0.33
78% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 73%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 2TB
746GB free
Firmware: 4.10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 46.7
Write 42.2
Mixed 30.5
30% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.42
4K Mixed 0.25
57% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 46%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
381GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 78.2
Write 67.4
Mixed 41
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.45
113% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 57%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 2TB
315GB free
Firmware: 4.10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 166
Write 98.3
Mixed 66.6
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 0.43
4K Mixed 0.24
60% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 46%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 2TB
229GB free
Firmware: 4.10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 116
Write 89.2
Mixed 39.4
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.24
56% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 46%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
184GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 81.1
Write 63.1
Mixed 65
52% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.26
80% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 51%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
176GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 51.1
Mixed 47.6
42% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.25
78% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 51%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 2TB
144GB free
Firmware: 4.10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 150
Write 95.5
Mixed 66.9
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 0.45
4K Mixed 0.23
58% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 46%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 1TB
136GB free
Firmware: 4.10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.6% Average
Read 96.9
Write 69.4
Mixed 61.5
57% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.22
53% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 80%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 1TB
32GB free
Firmware: 4.10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.7% Average
Read 78.6
Write 77.4
Mixed 72.5
57% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.57
4K Mixed 0.23
57% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 80%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 1TB
20GB free
Firmware: 4.10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.6% Below average
Read 57.1
Write 56.3
Mixed 57.1
43% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 0.55
4K Mixed 0.3
71% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x8GB
6 of 6 slots used
48GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 24
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 49.7
80% 49.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-EXTREME Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback