MSI MS-AF181

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-AF1811
MotherboardMSI MS-AF181  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '18 at 17:57
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 168
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 257
35% 262 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 AF18) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 6.59
3% 11.2 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.91
5% 6.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 729GB
585GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 650 855 824 892 892 881 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
163% Outstanding
Read 991
Write 894
Mixed 713
SusWrite 832
193% 858 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.8
196% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 41.2
DQ Write 459
DQ Mixed 425
277% 308 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Kingston 9905428-095.D00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.1
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-AF181 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-AF181

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback