Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z270M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '18 at 22:52
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 408
56% 417 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 152
Parallax 128
117% 141 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 140
Splatting 110
99% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 663 639 655 618 590 587 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,664
Write 1,454
Mixed 605
SusWrite 625
242% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 60.2
210% 82 MB/s
DQ Read 1,093
DQ Write 1,221
DQ Mixed 968
781% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 221%
Great: 254%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 578 737 815 861 863 864 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 918
Write 873
Mixed 620
SusWrite 786
180% 799 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 55.1
183% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 473
DQ Mixed 466
347% 457 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 162%
Great: 541%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 184 191 194 188 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 181
Write 151
Mixed 98.3
SusWrite 190
207% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
61% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.3% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 22
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback