Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 138 62% 100 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 354 36% 290 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Lighting 41.2 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 50.8 34% 40.5 fps	MRender 28 Gravity 36.3 Splatting 36.6 28% 33.6 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 258 259 260 258 260 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 58GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 8.1 9.4 9.3 9.5 9.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 19.5 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 9.2 23% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.7 150% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 10.9 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 11.7 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $368

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16