Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G840-$45 2,557 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 86.5 1-Core 73.1 2-Core 145 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 142 19% 143 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 836D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 4.96 Parallax 3.47 4% 4.23 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.47 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.49 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 120GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 45 52 47 40 44 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 37.5 Write 82.3 Mixed 69 SusWrite 45 13% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 9.5 25% 8.3 MB/s	DQ Read 7.7 DQ Write 10.8 4% 9.25 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 20%
Virtual Disk 960GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 275GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 50 55 52 59 52 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 84.2 Write 65.3 Mixed 84 SusWrite 53.5 54% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 7.6 1,276% 7.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.4 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	55x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	27x
Pentium G620Intel $30Bench 46%, 12,899 samples	14x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	35x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	12x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $77