Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL-C/1600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-C/1600  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '16 at 22:22
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5260
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 52.6
2-Core 104
50% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 102
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
MSI(1462 2794) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
7.47% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 13.5
7% 11.3 fps
MRender 7.57
Gravity 9.53
Splatting 10.1
8% 9.08 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.47%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600JB-00GVC0 160GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 51.7
Write 53.6
Mixed 46.8
38% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.25
68% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
23.6% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-C/1600 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-C/1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback