Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 78.7 1-Core 64.6 2-Core 128 55% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 300 30% 245 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gainward(10B0 1C81) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Lighting 33.8 Reflection 24.9 Parallax 33.7 28% 30.8 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 32.2 Splatting 31.6 27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 459 Write 17.7 Mixed 32.2 36% 170 MB/s	4K Read 48.8 4K Write 68.3 4K Mixed 26.1 144% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 8.8 DQ Mixed 0.5 27% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 790GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,512 Write 42.5 Mixed 91 633% 882 MB/s	4K Read 263 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.7 11,178% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 9.4 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $358