bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180114
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '18 at 21:37
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron X3216 APU
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.4% Poor
Memory 28.5
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 71.6
29% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 82.4
8-Core 84.8
11% 83.6 Pts
64-Core 81.4
5% 81.4 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
HP(103C 90B7) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 2
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.22
2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 61 59 58 69 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 309
Write 89.2
Mixed 256
SusWrite 59.8
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 23.2
72% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 97.4
DQ Write 73.9
DQ Mixed 81.6
62% 84.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB 3GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 6.4
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 263
15% 263 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback