Today's hottest deals

Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170830
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 05 '18 at 15:01
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 886
79% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,228
76% 1,228 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 191
Parallax 192
143% 186 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 178
Splatting 120
114% 141 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 628 307 305 305 304 303 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,894
Write 1,367
Mixed 606
SusWrite 359
233% 1,057 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 47.9
188% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 752
DQ Mixed 614
523% 769 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 193%
Great: 236%
Amd-raid Array 3 999GB
667GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 997 1001 1004 1005 789 577 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 814
Write 1,002
Mixed 739
SusWrite 896
195% 863 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 40.4
165% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 319
272% 387 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 156%
Great: 410%
Amd-raid INTEL SSDSC2CT12 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 119 116 118 121 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.1% Above average
Read 410
Write 130
Mixed 184
SusWrite 119
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 24.2
96% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 52.7
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 62.4
56% 82.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA DT01ACA2 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 165 165 165 165 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 171
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 162
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
149% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$51
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 26.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 22.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $451
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback