Today's hottest deals

Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory15GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory13 GB free of 15 GB
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '18 at 19:36
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 140
56% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 228
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Google PersistentDisk 54GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 31 31 31 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 124
Write 126
Mixed 129
SusWrite 31.6
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 5.3
889% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 83%
Google PersistentDisk 21GB
55GB free
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.8 8.2 8.4 8 8.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.8% Poor
Read 79.5
Write 17
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 8
32% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 3
622% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 26%
Google PersistentDisk 21GB
53GB free
Firmware: 1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 124
Write 126
Mixed 129
96% 126 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 6.7
1,082% 6.4 MB/s
Google PersistentDisk 21GB
49GB free
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
Read 124
Write 62.9
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 31.6
57% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 4
668% 3.87 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.2% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback