| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181004 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 09 '18 at 10:17 |
| Run Duration | 108 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.5%
Very good
|
68% 119 Pts
|
51% 378 Pts
|
22% 362 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8537) 2GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1747 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32.3%
Below average
|
34% 39.8 fps
|
30% 36.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 22 20 56 82 76 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
38% 52 MB/s
|
117% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend JM2400HLH-4G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
|
92.8%
Outstanding
|
97% 34.1 GB/s
|
76% 26.6 GB/s
|
45% 89.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 857 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $75Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 168x |
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $85Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 85x |
| Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples | 85x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 105x |
| RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples | 50x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 43x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 105% - Outstanding | Total price: $199 |