Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171212
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '18 at 20:47
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$176
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 990
90% 758 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56% Above average
Lighting 68
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 60.1
55% 65.7 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 70.9
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
220GB free
Firmware: 5KDA4101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 219 226 234 234 233 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 620
Write 258
Mixed 375
SusWrite 233
82% 372 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 48.5
177% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 439
DQ Write 379
DQ Mixed 272
241% 363 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 112%
Great: 141%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$79
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 442 452 457 451 457 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,445
Write 2150
Mixed 1,301
SusWrite 454
353% 1,588 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 89.8
302% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,418
DQ Write 1,099
DQ Mixed 1,224
925% 1,247 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 275%
Great: 340%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
162GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 210 290 286 284 291 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 484
Mixed 356
SusWrite 307
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 42
154% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 188
183% 290 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 99%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 165 163 166 162 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 140
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 163
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.2
102% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 121%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 51 51 52 52 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 124 124 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 126
Write 118
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 121
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 104 104 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 96.3
Write 105
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 102
121% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 42%
TP03000G B 3TB
831GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 0 1.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28% Poor
Read 125
Write 123
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 0.2
102% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
146% 1.7 MB/s
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB
774GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 86 86 85 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 89.7
Write 83
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 86.2
103% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 42%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 104 104 103 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 190
Write 136
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 102
161% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 22.3
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 26.7
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback