Asus P5LD2-SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5LD2-SE  (all builds)
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '18 at 09:53
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 43.7
31% 42.6 Pts
4-Core 42.9
8-Core 42.6
6% 42.8 Pts
64-Core 42.7
3% 42.7 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 847B) 1,024MB
Ram: 1,023MB, Driver: 314.22
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 1.25
2% 2.19 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.62 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541212H9SA00 120GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP4OC20F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 10 9.6 7.8 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.32% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 9
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 10.3
8% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.32%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x0.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
1GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.83 GB/s
SC Read 0
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 0.2
4% 1.3 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5LD2-SE Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5LD2-SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback